A model for encoding local movement, blocking, cover, and exact control inside orthogonal space without losing connection to wider route logic.
4 occupancy tests turns a model for encoding local movement, blocking, cover, and exact control inside orthogonal space without losing connection to wider route logic.
Models4 occupancy testsSpatialSpatial StructuresLocalSpatial Topic Models4 related
Grid space is strongest when local occupancy rules stay connected to the wider network the grid sits inside. Otherwise the grid becomes a self-contained puzzle instead of a spatial system.
The grid is a local precision tool. It can show exact blocking, cover, door control, and firing geometry far better than a regional map, but it should still inherit the logic of the district, corridor, or building network around it.
That inheritance matters because local control only becomes strategically meaningful when it changes something larger: whether a gate remains open, whether a bridge can be crossed, whether a depot entrance can be held, or whether movement through a district slows enough to matter upstream.
Use the grid as a local lens on a larger system
Test 1Define what a tile means
Tie each cell to a real action scale so occupancy reflects room, street, lane, or work-space logic.
Test 2Model blocking honestly
Show where occupation closes movement entirely and where it only taxes movement or attention.
Test 3Map cover and angles
Use local geometry to explain why some positions sustain control while others only delay entry.
Test 4Reconnect to the route network
Identify which local cells correspond to gates, bridges, depots, or junctions that matter beyond the immediate scene.
Four tests in a grid occupancy model.
Axis
Question
Signal
Tile meaning
What real space or action budget does one cell represent?
Room width, street span, firing lane, work parcel
Blocking
How does occupation change available movement?
Closed lanes, stack limits, chokepoint tiles, door control
Cover
How is protection distributed locally?
Walls, angles, elevation, hard corners, shielded lanes
Network connection
How does local occupancy affect the larger route system?
Bridge tiles, gate rooms, street junctions, depot entrances
The most important grid cells are rarely generic interior tiles. They are the cells that sit on a wider relation: stair cores, gate rooms, choke corners, street mouths, dock edges, and depot entrances. These are the points where local occupancy starts changing regional throughput and route choice.
This is why grids should not be authored as detached tactical minigames unless detachment is the actual design goal. If a local battle cannot affect corridor continuity, storage access, or territorial reach, the grid may be visually precise while strategically irrelevant.
The reusable lesson is that orthogonal precision works best when it remains plugged into the wider movement system. A good grid clarifies local leverage instead of isolating local play from the rest of the world.
Use this model for tactical maps, facility layouts, district combat spaces, or work simulations where exact occupation matters but broader route logic still decides the stakes.
Continuation Map
Use this node as a deliberate step, not a terminal page.
Read what should come before it, what relation role matters next, and where this page should hand you off after the local graph is clear.
Before this node
2 prerequisites to read first
Start with Region Graph and then return here once the surrounding concept stack is clear.
Adjacent graph
4 linked nodes to branch into
Use Route Hierarchy or the linked nodes below when you want to compare this page against neighboring parts of the graph.
Glossary 2 · Model 2Next move
Open Frameworks
Return to broader lenses when this model is too specific for the question you are asking.
Cross-layer moveBranch fit
Continue by shared branch or operating scale.
3 handoff nodes stay inside Spatial Structures. No handoff nodes currently share Local.
Continue from this node by program branch and operating scale.
Detail pages now expose the branch and scale of their surrounding graph before showing raw prerequisite and relation shelves, so continuation can stay taxonomy-led instead of adjacency-led.
Program Branch
Spatial Structures
Spatial Structures
3 entries
Explain how topology, region graphs, corridors, map abstraction, and scale determine movement and leverage.
Start in Spatial, reduce the map into region graph and corridor logic, test topology under disruption, then return through a spatial design guide.
4 redundancy classes turns a model for comparing how many viable substitutes exist between important nodes and how quickly a topology collapses when one edge is lost.
4 projection limits turns a model for how far and how long force can be projected effectively before supply, delay, terrain, and recovery costs collapse performance.
